The coaching skills assessment.
Most managers can't say how they coach, only that they do. The COACHindex™ maps it: where you sit on the Coaching Box, which steps of the coaching conversation you skip, and which derailers show up when you're under pressure. Then it points at the next box.
COACHindex™ · individual results
73 overall- The Coaching Skills Cycle +9
- The Coaching Box +14
- The Coaching Continuum +11
- Task-to-Outcome Accountability +16
- The Coachability Framework +13
- The Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ +10
Sample item
When a direct report brings me a problem, my first move is a question.
Illustrative results. Sample data, not client results.
- Instrument
- COACHindex™, the manager's coaching self-assessment.
- What it maps
- Your Coaching Box position, the cycle steps you skip, and your coaching derailers.
- Nature
- A development diagnostic, not a psychometric instrument. Its value is the conversation it starts with yourself.
- Cadence
- Baseline, apply the matrix to real direct reports, re-take. Movement is measured one box forward.
A coaching skills assessment maps how a manager actually coaches, as opposed to how they describe it. Managing directs the work; coaching transfers the thinking. Most managers do some of each without knowing which, and the assessment’s job is to make the pattern visible: whether you direct or develop, how you set accountability, and what you do when a direct report brings you a problem you could solve in thirty seconds.
This page covers what the COACHindex™ measures, what the read-out shows, what it is honest about not being, and what to do with the result. There is a two-minute self-check below if you want to start with yourself.
What the assessment measures
The COACHindex™ is the manager’s coaching self-assessment. It reads your habits against the models in the Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ program, so each result maps to something you can practice.
It places you on the Coaching Box, a two-by-two of relationship and accountability. High relationship with low accountability is the buddy, who gives people a pass. Low on both is the absentee landlord. Low relationship with high accountability is the micromanager, on a leash about six inches long. The coaching box is the corner where both are high. It shows which steps of the Coaching Skills Cycle you skip: create safety, transfer thinking, transfer ownership, then provide guidance and accountability. It locates you on the Coaching Continuum from tell to ask. And it surfaces your coaching derailers, the sixteen habits in four families that turn the coach into the problem.
What it is honest about not being
The COACHindex™ is a development diagnostic rather than a psychometric instrument. It does not produce a norm-referenced score, it does not claim validation, and it is a self-rating, which means it measures how you see your own coaching. Its value is the conversation it starts with yourself and the plan it produces.
That honesty matters when you compare it with instruments that promise more. A coaching “profile” that assigns you a type has told you something about your preferences. The COACHindex™ tells you something about your behavior, mapped to a model that prescribes the next move. The second is more useful on Monday.
The gap the matrix exposes
The read-out gets practical when it meets your actual direct reports. The Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ places each person by two axes: the accountability level they are ready for (task, process, or outcome) and the coaching approach that fits (tell, tell-and-ask, or ask). Most managers discover the same thing: they coach everyone the way they themselves like to be coached, which over-coaches the capable and under-coaches the new.
Consider a nursing unit manager with fourteen reports who scores herself as a strong coach. Her COACHindex™ places her in the buddy corner, high relationship, accountability pitched at task level for everyone, including two charge nurses who have been running the floor for years. The matrix puts the charge nurses at outcome-level accountability and asking; she has been telling them which supplies to reorder. The plan for each is one line: the box they are in, and the next one. The assessment did not tell her she was a bad coach. It told her she was coaching the wrong people the wrong way, which is a fixable thing.
What to do with the result
Pick the next box, not the best one. That is the work of coaching skills training, and it starts here: for each direct report, the matrix names the box they are in today and the one after it, and you can’t skip boxes. Practice the move that gets them there, in the one-on-ones you already run: tell-to-ask, the question funnel (open what, why, and how questions at the top, where the critical thinking transfers), and B.I.G. feedback, which names the behavior, shows the impact, and then guides, ideally by letting the person generate the guidance themselves.
Then re-take the assessment. Movement is measured one box forward. And count what came back to your desk this week that used to be delegated. That number is the result the instrument exists to move.
Where to start
Start with the self-check above, honestly, on a busy week. Then take the COACHindex™ in a Skill Preview and place your three most capable reports and your three newest on the matrix. If the six of them land in the same box, you have found the thing to practice first.
What the read-out shows
Three views of how you coach today.
The report is a mirror, not a weapon. Each view maps to a model in the Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ program, so the result tells you what to practice, not only what to feel about it.
-
Your Coaching Box position
Relationship against accountability. Buddy, absentee landlord, micromanager, or the coaching box where both are high. Nobody is born in the coaching box.
-
The cycle steps you skip
Create safety, transfer thinking, transfer ownership, provide guidance and accountability. Most managers skip the first and rush the third.
-
Your coaching derailers
Sixteen derailers in four families: communication, emotional reactivity, control, and engagement. When derailers show up, the coach becomes the problem.
-
Where you sit on the continuum
Tell to ask. The single biggest problem with most coaches is that they tell too much, and the read-out shows whether you are one of them.
-
The next box
The result is framed as a direction, not a grade: which box you are in with each kind of report, and which one is next. You can't skip boxes.
What you get back.
An overall score against the baseline, every dimension on its own, the movement between the two measures, and the lowest items named, so the report ends in something to practice rather than a number to admire.
COACHindex™ · leader report
Overall
73/100
+11 since baseline (62)
BaselineRe-measure
By dimension
- The Coaching Skills Cycle 60+8
- The Coaching Box 74+13
- The Coaching Continuum 79+9
- Task-to-Outcome Accountability 74+14
- The Coachability Framework 79+10
- The Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ 74+15
Movement by dimension
- The Coaching Skills Cycle +8
- The Coaching Box +13
- The Coaching Continuum +9
- Task-to-Outcome Accountability +14
A self-assessment: the movement between the two measures is the evidence.
Lowest items · work these first
- 41 When a report brings me a problem, my first move is a question.The Coaching Skills Cycle
- 52 I can say, for each person, whether I hold them to a task, a process, or an outcome.The Coaching Box
- 50 Work I delegate stays delegated.Task-to-Outcome Accountability
Illustrative report with sample data. Not client results.
Two-minute self-check
How do you coach, on an ordinary week?
Six statements, one per model. Rate each as it is on a busy week with a full inbox, not on the week after a leadership course. Then read the question underneath.
Your self-rating
/ 5
A self-rating is where a coaching assessment starts, not where it ends. The COACHindex™ maps the same habits against the models, and the matrix places each of your direct reports, which is where the result turns into a plan.
Take the COACHindex™ in a free Skill PreviewNot a validated instrument and not stored anywhere. A self-rating shows how you see yourself; the measured version compares that with how your team experiences you.
Not sure this is the skill you need?
If the read-out says your mechanics are fine and the relationships still fray, the gap is Emotional Intelligence and the EQindex® is the better instrument. If the work stalls between teams rather than at your desk, look at the COHESIONindex™.
See the emotional intelligence assessmentFrequently asked questions
- What is a coaching skills assessment?
- A coaching skills assessment is a structured self-rating that maps how a manager actually coaches: whether they direct or develop, how they set accountability, which steps of a coaching conversation they skip, and which habits derail them under pressure. LeaderFactor's COACHindex™ reads those against the Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ so the result points at what to practice.
- What does the COACHindex™ measure?
- It maps where a manager sits on the Coaching Box, the two-by-two of relationship and accountability; which steps of the Coaching Skills Cycle they skip; where they sit on the tell-to-ask continuum; and which of sixteen coaching derailers show up in their conversations. It is a development diagnostic rather than a psychometric instrument.
- Is the COACHindex™ a validated instrument?
- No, and it does not claim to be. It is a development diagnostic: its value is the conversation it starts with yourself and the plan it produces for each direct report. Of LeaderFactor's instruments, PSindex® for psychological safety is the one with a published validation study. The COACHindex™ is read for direction, not for a norm-referenced score.
- How do you measure improvement in coaching skills?
- Take the COACHindex™ at baseline, apply the Coaching & Accountability Matrix™ to your real direct reports for a few weeks, and re-take it. Movement is measured one box forward. The second measure needs no instrument: count the delegations that stop coming back to your desk.
- What are coaching derailers?
- Habits that turn the coach into the problem. There are sixteen, in four families: communication (impulsiveness, dominance, interruption, nonverbal cues), emotional reactivity (impatience, judgment, defensiveness, emotionality), control (control, micromanagement, ego, negativity), and engagement (focus, engagement, timing, disregard). The assessment shows which ones show up in yours.
Turn managers into coaches people follow.
Take the instrument in a free one-hour Skill Preview and leave with your own read-out. Or talk with us about running it across your teams.
or start with the free guide, The coaching blueprint →