To create incubators of innovation where divergent thinking, creative abrasion and constructive dissent thrive, we must learn not only to tolerate, but actually invite and welcome constructive feedback. This may feel like an unnatural act at first, but it’s a skill you can develop. The key is to disable your defensive and dismissive tendencies and let go of your pride of authorship, so you can see the value of what’s being offered. Instead of flying solo you can let constructive feedback elevate your outcomes as you process it effectively. Here’s how:
If the source is credible and the intent is helpful, remind yourself that negative feedback is not a referendum on your value as a human being, nor is it an attack on your identity or dignity. In fact, if the negative feedback comes from a quality source with genuine intent, you take a massive risk if you ignore or dismiss it.
You can’t effectively process otherwise. Learn to regulate your emotional response enough to remove your pride of authorship. Be proud of what you’ve brought to the table, then let others build on it (or even tear it down). You’re human, so completely detaching emotionally is impossible, but there is value in learning to trade authorship for enhancement.
Someone who takes the time to offer you specific, honest feedback wouldn’t waste your time with comments of no value. Show them that you value their time and find their argument’s reasoning and merit. Maybe they noticed something that you missed.
Good and thoughtful questions can make the difference between perceiving feedback as well-meaning and constructive instead of as harsh criticism. Turn constructive criticism into a dialogue: identify the problems involved, ask for clarification, and brainstorm together so that you can find solutions.
Tell yourself your argument, then deconstruct it. What are its weaknesses? What doesn’t make sense? What could go wrong? This exercise will help feedback become a crucial part of your process, instead of a roadblock in the way of progress.
Is it emotional or intellectual? Is it built on feelings or strong evidence and logic? If your defensiveness is primarily emotional, take a step back and look at the whole picture. Choose to process constructive criticism with logic, not emotion.
Do others expect something different than you? If so, this will be reflected in their feedback. A lack of clear expectations does not mean failure or incompetence, but it does provide an opportunity to try again. Clarify expectations and iterate where necessary.
Challenger safety satisfies the basic human need to make things better. It’s the support and confidence we need to ask questions such as, “Why do we do it this way?” “What if we tried this?” or “May I suggest a better way?”
There’s some truth to the adage: out of sight, out of mind. If you’re a remote worker you may be wondering if this applies to you. Does the adage hold weight on our virtual teams? Are we left to the mercy of cloud-based collaboration tools to remind our employers of our existence? If we’re only “in sight” when we’re on-screen, can we still have an impact on our organizations?
Contributor safety satisfies the basic human need for autonomy and contribution. You feel safe and are given the opportunity and role clarity to use your skills and abilities to make a difference. Here are five behaviors that will help you foster contributor safety on your team.